Total Pageviews
Friday, 29 May 2020
Stimulus check 2 for an extra $1,200? What's going on with a second round of payments - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/3cekKgH
via IFTTT
Magic Leap CEO Rony Abovitz reportedly stepping down at AR startup - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/2Xy7uOo
via IFTTT
NBN to get 250Mbps on entire HFC network by June 2021, only 7% can get 750Mbps
from Latest news https://ift.tt/2yMaEGa
via IFTTT
New online hub to help regional Aussies 'make the most' of what tech is available
from Latest news https://ift.tt/2ZNGdu8
via IFTTT
Coles partners with Flybuys to launch Flypay
from Latest news https://ift.tt/3eAnIOd
via IFTTT
Magic Leap CEO Rony Abovitz to step down
Rony Abovitz, the co-founder and CEO of lavishly funded augmented reality company Magic Leap, will step down from his position, reports Business Insider. Abovitz’s planned departure, which doesn’t yet have a concrete date, marks an unceremonious end to his tenure at the helm of Magic Leap, a once-buzzy startup that earned a high profile for how secretive it was early on about its technology and the eye-popping amounts of venture capital it raised.
Magic Leap has so far raised about $3 billion dollars over the last decade, though it has only released one product, the Magic Leap 1 headset. The company raised $350 million of that funding just earlier this month, after laying off about 1,000 employees back in April and ditching its consumer...
from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/36Fthbb
via IFTTT
Open For Good: Summer berry pie in the Ninja Foodie Pressure Cooker
from Digital Trends https://ift.tt/2M73Wxg
via IFTTT
Digital Trends Originals
from Digital Trends https://ift.tt/343AjUF
via IFTTT
School’s out: How we learn in the age of coronavirus
from Digital Trends https://ift.tt/394cjTr
via IFTTT
How to convert M4A files to MP3
from Digital Trends https://ift.tt/2twFlK6
via IFTTT
ACLU sues Clearview AI claiming the company's tech crosses ethical bounds
from Latest news https://ift.tt/2zF134l
via IFTTT
A sequel to the Sonic the Hedgehog movie is in development
A sequel to the Sonic the Hedgehog movie is in development, as first reported by Variety. It’s unclear when the film might be released, but Sonic the Hedgehog director Jeff Fowler and screenwriters Pat Casey and Josh Miller are all returning for the sequel.
Fowler confirmed that he’ll be back to direct on Twitter.
ROUND TWO WITH THE BLUE!! https://t.co/YTabuZy08C
— Jeff Fowler (@fowltown) May 28, 2020
Sonic the Hedgehog was a hit for Paramount, earning $70 million in its first four days in theaters this February, according to Variety. However, the film initially had some controversy because of the design of its titular character.
The first design for Sonic’s movie representation was strangely (horrifyingly) humanlike. The backlash...
from The Verge - All Posts https://ift.tt/3dpdcJv
via IFTTT
President Trump's executive order concerning social media companies - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/3dchdR7
via IFTTT
Space Force review: Netflix comedy sees the funny(ish) side of the moon - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/3evA6io
via IFTTT
Protect your AirPods: 5 cases under $15 - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/2XTosHx
via IFTTT
Sonic the Hedgehog sequel officially in the works - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/2XFZ2gb
via IFTTT
Every way you can take a screenshot on your Android phone or tablet - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/2Xc3R1Z
via IFTTT
9 great Father's Day gifts under $50 - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/3dehaEq
via IFTTT
Excited NASA scientists watch as night-shining clouds form over Arctic - CNET
from CNET https://ift.tt/2TQqRkP
via IFTTT
How to download music from YouTube
from Digital Trends https://ift.tt/2xcC2Ig
via IFTTT
How to play YouTube in the background on Android and iOS
from Digital Trends https://ift.tt/2zWzHVy
via IFTTT
The exhausting playbook behind Trump’s battle with Twitter
Four years ago, a Breitbart writer famed for championing a harassment campaign targeting women in video games used his air time during a White House press briefing to blast Twitter. He was angry that he’d lost his verification badge, that little blue check mark, after the company said he had repeatedly violated the platform’s rules against inciting harassment. But he insisted that Twitter was actually punishing him for something else.
“It’s becoming very clear,” Milo Yiannopoulos told Josh Earnest, then the press secretary for the Obama administration, in March of 2016, “that Twitter and Facebook in particular are censoring and punishing conservative and libertarian points of view.” Later that year, Twitter banned him entirely following his role in a harassment campaign against the actress Leslie Jones after she starred in a remake of Ghostbusters that swapped the original male lead roles for female ones, infuriating misogynists. In response, he claimed that Twitter was now a “a no-go zone for conservatives.”
Other conservative and far-right figures have regularly lodged similar complaints in the years since, depicting Twitter’s enforcement of its policies against abuse and misinformation as a crusade against anti-conservative bias; the charges have then filtered up into conservative and mainstream press coverage. But the issue came to a head this week, after Twitter appended fact-checks to two of President Trump’s tweets, noting that they contained misleading claims about mail-in voting.
Trump attacked the move as censorship and promised a response. He’s just signed an executive order that could penalize major social-media companies for perceived censorship of conservative views.
This moment feels like an inevitable escalation of a conflict that has been playing out across the major social-media companies, but particularly Twitter, for years—one that Yiannopoulos’s White House stunt foreshadowed. As platforms reckon with their role in amplifying misinformation, abuse, and extreme views, the arguments about content moderation that once lived on the fringes of Twitter’s rules increasingly involve people at the very center of mainstream power.
“Republicans feel that Social Media Platforms totally silence conservatives voices,” Trump tweeted to his 80 million followers this week. “We will strongly regulate, or close them down, before we can ever allow this to happen.” His comments were covered widely in the media, as are many of his more inflammatory or conspiratorial tweets.
Hours before news of the coming executive order broke, Trump advisor Kellyanne Conway went on Fox News and encouraged viewers to hound a Twitter employee, spelling out his account handle and blaming him for the decision to fact-check the president’s tweets. “Somebody in San Francisco go wake him up and tell him he’s about to get a lot more followers,” she said.
Trump himself tagged the employee in a tweet on Thursday, effectively directing supporters to fill his mentions with abusive messages. The Twitter employee is also reportedly receiving death threats.
This cycle has been set off in the past when Twitter has rolled out new policies designed to protect targets of abuse, suspended far-right accounts for rule violations, or stepped up efforts to slow the spread of misinformation. It begins with waves of speculation arguing that Twitter isn’t actually, say, enforcing its new abuse policies but instead implementing a secret anti-conservative agenda that must be stopped. Then there’s a rush to find and target someone responsible for implementing it. The blueprint dates back at least to Gamergate, the harassment campaign championed by Yiannopoulos targeting women in video-game development, whose supporters also claimed instead to be fighting a conspiracy against them ( “It’s actually about ethics in gaming journalism”).
The president uses his own account to continually test Twitter’s boundaries, and now he’s become the catalyst for a new cycle. In just the past week, he’s used his platform to amplify conspiracy theories suggesting that MSNBC host Joe Scarborough murdered a staffer and to spread misinformation about mail-in voting in an earlier series of tweets that were not subject to fact-check labels. He thanked a “Cowboys for Trump” account that tweeted a video where an unidentified man proclaimed that “the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat.” (After cheers from the audience, the speaker then clarifies that he meant the comment “politically.”) The widower of the deceased staffer at the heart of the Scarborough conspiracy theory has begged Twitter to intervene.
The company had not taken any action against those tweets as of Thursday, although it has indicated that it is working to expand the labeling system that was used to flag some of Trump’s tweets about mail-in voting.
Until the fact-checking labels were introduced to two of Trump’s tweets on Tuesday, the platform had scrupulously avoided enforcing its rules against Trump’s account. Some explanations for the enforcement loopholes have cited the newsworthiness of otherwise rule-breaking content and Trump’s status as the head of a government.
But Trump, despite the lack of evidence to support claims of systemic social-media bias against conservatives, has repeatedly promised to take up the issue on behalf of some of his more prominent supporters. In 2018, he accused Google of “rigging” news search results against conservative media, repeating a version of a claim that Trump supporters—including vloggers Diamond and Silk—had circulated in conservative media for a few days earlier. Diamond and Silk (whose real names are Lynnette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson) claimed at a House Judiciary Committee hearing that April that they were being “censored” by Facebook because of their support for Trump.
In 2019, Trump met with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and reportedly took the opportunity to complain about losing Twitter followers. On the same day as that meeting, Trump tweeted that the platform was “very discriminatory.” He later tweeted that his administration was “closely” monitoring conservatives’ complaints of censorship. Later that year, Trump held a “social-media summit” with dozens of his most passionate online supporters to air their collective complaints that Google, Facebook, and Twitter were censoring them.
None of these claims have to be true to be popular, which is something Trump and his online supporters know well. They just need to sound controversial enough to grab attention—or, better yet, redirect it from something else.
from MIT Technology Review https://ift.tt/3gy0R7x
via IFTTT